ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Post-mortem supravital skeletal muscle excitability for early post-mortem interval estimation: a scoping review and methodological map.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary on: Post-mortem supravital skeletal muscle excitability for early post-mortem interval estimation: a scoping review and methodological map.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early post-mortem interval (PMI) estimation relies mainly on temperature-based nomograms together with rigor and livor mortis, all imprecise in the first hours after death - a limitation underscored by a recent independent validation of the compound method reporting an overall agreement of only ~ 37%. Post-mortem supravital skeletal-muscle excitability, evoked electrically or mechanically, is a long-standing but fragmented adjunctive marker. This scoping review maps the available evidence and derives the methodological requirements of a future prospective study, addressing the question: what evidence exists on post-mortem supravital skeletal-muscle excitability, induced by electrical or mechanical stimulation, as an adjunctive tool for early PMI estimation? Following the JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting, a Population-Concept-Context framework defined eligibility. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched without language or date limits, with citation searching of key authors. Records were charted along ten predefined dimensions and appraised with study-type-adapted instruments. Twenty-six included records - corresponding to approximately 21 independent contributions after collapsing companion papers and consecutive series that report overlapping datasets - were organised into five streams: objectified/subjective electrical excitability, mechanical idiomuscular reaction, the compound method, post-stimulation structural artifacts, and animal models. Electrical methods provided the most precise estimates (95% confidence limits ~ ± 2.7-±2.85 h up to ~ 13 h) but required invasive instrumentation; mechanical reaction testing was field-deployable but operator-dependent and strongly modulated by biological and environmental factors. Within the compound method, adding non-temperature criteria - including muscular excitability - narrowed the temperature-based interval in roughly two-thirds of scene cases. A recurrent probative caveat is that structural alterations classically regarded as vital can be reproduced post-mortem in the supravital phase. Controlled animal (rat) models complemented the human evidence, characterising the decay of the compound muscle action potential and indicating that its onset latency is comparatively independent of the cause of death. Supravital muscle excitability is a promising adjunctive marker to be standardised and prospectively validated within the compound method, not used as a stand-alone determinant of the time of death. The review specifies the resulting research agenda: a prospective, minimally invasive study in deaths with a certified time of death, with standardised stimulation, objectified outcomes, systematic recording of confounders and internal validation against a temperature-based reference model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.