Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360673›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).

Stasja Koot, Nowella Anyango-van Zwieten, Sian Sullivan, Wolfram Dressler, Marja Spierenburg, Lisa Trogisch, Esther Marijnen, Robert Fletcher, Inaya Rakhmani, Suraya Abdulwahab Afiff and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stasja KootSociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-7525
Nowella Anyango-van ZwietenForest and Nature Conservation Policy Group and Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sian SullivanResearch Centre for Environmental Humanities, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-8843
Wolfram DresslerSchool of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marja SpierenburgInstitute of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lisa TrogischSociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Esther MarijnenSociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Robert FletcherSociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-1697
Inaya RakhmaniDepartment of Communication and Asia Research Centre, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Suraya Abdulwahab AfiffDepartment of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Tor A BenjaminsenDepartment of International Environment and Development Studies, Faculty of Landscape and Society, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway.
Sarah MilneEnvironment and Development, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Hanne SvarstadDevelopment Studies, IST, LUI, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Bram BüscherSociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anwesha DuttaChr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.
Nitin D RaiIndependent, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

conservationdebateepistemological violenceintimidationpluralismpowersocial science research

Identifiers

PMID42360673
PMCPMC13392787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.