ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Survival outcomes and a prognostic nomogram in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis: a real-world cohort study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeptomeningeal metastasis (LM) carries a poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to explore clinical features and survival outcomes and develop a nomogram for overall survival (OS) in this population.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 288 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM from Fujian Cancer Hospital (January 2019-March 2024). Prognostic variables were selected by LASSO regression followed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. Internal validation used 1000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed by the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.
resultsMedian OS was 16.2 months. Before LM, 71.5% of patients received third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 76.7% received third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy after LM. Eight variables were identified by LASSO-Cox regression: ECOG performance status (PS), prior lines of systemic therapy, cranial MRI findings, third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy before and after LM, antiangiogenic therapy after LM, chemotherapy after LM, and CNS radiotherapy after LM. Post-LM third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy was the strongest treatment-associated prognostic factor (HR = 2.23; p < 0.001), with survival benefit maintained regardless of prior third-generation EGFR-TKI exposure (prior-exposed: HR = 0.60, p = 0.029; TKI-naïve: HR = 0.18, p < 0.001). The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (AUC: 0.777, 0.778, and 0.742 for 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS; C-index: 0.716).
conclusionIn EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM, post-LM third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy was associated with longer survival, regardless of prior third-generation EGFR-TKI use. The nomogram may support individualized risk stratification but requires external validation in independent multi-institutional cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.