ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Resistance-guided isolation and identification of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from bull semen: exploring alternatives to antibiotics in semen extenders.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial contamination in bull semen adversely affects semen quality and fertility, with rising antibiotic resistance highlighting the need for effective alternatives. This study focused on isolating antibiotic-resistant bacteria from Sahiwal bull semen using antibiotics like penicillin and streptomycin, followed by identification through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The predominant resistant bacteria included Bacillus cereus (50%), Proteus mirabilis (17%), Enterococcus spp. (17%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5%), Klebsiella variicola (5%), and others like Niallia circulans. From these, Bacillus cereus (Gram-positive) and Proteus mirabilis (Gram-negative) were selected for further analysis. The antimicrobial efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and a cyclic hexapeptide (c-WFW AMP) was evaluated as potential antibiotic alternatives (ATAs). ZnO NPs inhibited both bacteria at 60 µg/ml, while c-WFW AMP was effective at 4 µg/ml for Bacillus spp. and 6 µg/ml for Proteus spp. The minimum bactericidal concentrations were 80 µg/ml for ZnO NPs and 6 µg/ml for c-WFW AMP against both strains, indicating potent bactericidal action. These findings support the use of ZnO NPs and c-WFW AMP as promising ATAs in semen extenders to control bacterial contamination and reduce reliance on conventional antibiotics in bull semen preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.