ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Prevalence and range of geriatric medicine services across Europe: a survey of 39 countries.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction/purposesThe role of geriatricians has evolved across Europe in response to increasing ageing populations. However, there is much variation with some countries providing a range of geriatric medicine (GM) services, while others have few or no services. This survey assessed the type and frequency of different GM services provided across Europe.
methodsA cross-sectional survey of the board members of the European Union of Medical Specialists-Geriatric Medicine Section was performed, requesting information on the existence and frequency of 25 types of possible GM-related services (ranging from inpatient, rehabilitation, liaison, outpatient and community services). The questionnaire classified service availability from institutions into four levels: No-0(not available), Yes-1(Minority of institutions < 25%), Yes-2(Some; 25-75%) or Yes-3(Majority; > 75%). A descriptive comparative analysis was performed.
resultsWe got responses from 39 countries, divided into 4 geographical regions: Nordic (n = 5), Central/West Europe (n = 9), East Europe (n = 17) and South Europe (n = 8). We found great variation in services between countries, with the Nordic (80%) and Central/West (86.2%) countries providing most of the surveyed geriatric medicine services, while East Europe lacked most geriatric medicine services (24.9% only) and South Europe having a mixed picture. A notable 33% of the countries reported having no acute geriatric wards, 17.9% in a minority, 17.9% in some and 30.7% in most of the institutions in their countries.
conclusionThis is the first large survey of provision of GM services across Europe and shows wide discrepancy across European countries. The data will be helpful for discussions with policy makers in developing GM services in their countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.