ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Prevalence of Neospora caninum in cows and sheep in Kyrgyzstan.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study determined the prevalence of Neospora caninum in cows and sheep in Kyrgyzstan, as well as the incidence of this parasite in infertile cows and sheep that had aborted. For this purpose, 507 cows and 502 sheep from commercial farms in different regions of the country were investigated. Individual blood samples were taken from all sheep and cows. The animals included 70 sheep that had aborted, 104 normal pregnant sheep, 173 newly parturient sheep, and 155 infertile sheep, as well as 36 cows that had aborted, 244 normal pregnant cows, 140 fresh cows, and 87 repeat-breeder cows. The levels of N. caninum antibodies in the blood samples were determined using a commercial ELISA kit. N. caninum positivity was observed in 5.38% of sheep, including 4.29% of sheep that had aborted, 1.04% of normal pregnant sheep, 9.82% of newly parturient sheep, and 3.87% of infertile sheep. N. caninum positivity was detected in 11.05% of cows, including 25.00% of cows that had aborted, 11.48% of normal pregnant cows, 1.39% of fresh cows, and 19.54% of repeat-breeder cows. In summary, the rate of N. caninum seropositivity was higher in cows than in sheep, and the parasite was more frequently detected in cows with a history of abortion and repeat breeding, highlighting the need for effective preventive and control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.