Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360637›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026

Loneliness around the world: patterns, predictors, and well-being implications.

David Leblang, Dennis Wesselbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David LeblangDepartment of Politics and Batten School of Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Dennis WesselbaumDepartment of Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. dennis.wesselbaum@otago.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-6689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness is increasingly recognized as a global public health concern, yet cross-national evidence remains limited. Using data from the 2023-2024 Gallup World Poll, this study provides a globally representative description of loneliness across 148 countries (N = 218,048). Over one in five adults reported feeling lonely, with prevalence highest in low-income countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. Multivariate analyses identified several predictors of lower loneliness, such as better health, higher education, larger household size, and employment, though their associations varied by context. Loneliness was also associated with lower subjective well-being, more frequent negative emotions, and stronger migration intentions. These patterns were most pronounced in high-income and more developed regions, where loneliness appeared more psychologically burdensome despite lower prevalence. Overall, the findings highlight loneliness as a universal but context-sensitive experience, suggesting the need for policies that consider both structural and psychosocial factors to promote social connection and emotional well-being worldwide.

Indexed as

Global HealthLonelinessAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalencePsychological Well-BeingSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGlobal healthLonelinessSubjective well-beingSurvey data

Identifiers

PMID42360637
PMCPMC13612629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.