Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360625›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Development loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC).

Alazar Amare Amdiyee, Tesfaye Sisay Tessema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alazar Amare AmdiyeeBiotechnology Research Center, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. amarealazar633@gmail.com.
Tesfaye Sisay TessemaBiotechnology Research Center, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is a major etiological agent of persistent diarrhea in pediatric and adult population globally and it is a leading cause of infant mortality in developing countries. Bacterial culture and biochemical assays are insufficient for accurately identifying EPEC strains. In contrast, PCR serves as a major molecular diagnostic method for EPEC. However, the application of PCR is limited due to high cost, time taking and technical requirements. METHOD AND

resultsIn this study loop mediated isothermal amplification LAMP) was developed for rapid, specific, easy and resource-friendly detection of EPEC. The LAMP assay was developed by designing specific lamp primers targeting eae genes, in combination with stx1 and stx2 lamp primers to enable EPEC detection. The reaction mixture, which contained 2.5 µL of isothermal amplification buffer, 10 mM of MgSO4 solution, 1.4 mM of dNTPs, 1.8 mM of FIP and BIP, 0.4 mM of F3 and B3, 0.2 mM of LB, 8U of Bst polymerase, and 2.0 µL of the target DNA template, was incubated at 62 C0 for 60 minutes. The designed lamp assay's performance was assessed utilizing 60 bacterial trains that were isolated locally. The assay attained 100% efficiency (60/60), 100% sensitivity (10/10), and 100% specificity (50/50). Furthermore, both the positive and negative predictive scores were 100%. Up to 0.05 pg of DNA could be detected in each reaction using the developed LAMP test. The traditional PCR, on the other hand, showed a detection limit of 5 pg/reaction. Additionally, the developed LAMP assay was able to detect up to 7 x 102 cfu/g stool in a spiked stool sample. PCR, however, can identify up to 7 x 104 cfu/g of stool. Notably, compared to conventional PCR, the LAMP assay has a 100-fold greater sensitivity. The result obtained from LAMP and PCR tests showed a perfect agreement with a kappa value of 1 (k = 1).

conclusionThe developed LAMP assay demonstrated promising performance for the detection of EPEC under controlled laboratory conditions, offering a rapid and straightforward alternative to conventional diagnostic methods. Clinical validation using patient stool sample and further studies with larger sample sets are needed to fully establish the assay's performance and support its broader clinical application.

Indexed as

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAdhesins, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityShiga Toxin 1Adhesins, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA PrimerseaeA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsShiga Toxin 1EPECLAMPMolecular diagnosticPCRSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID42360625
PMCPMC13309408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.