Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360623›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

When everything is violence, nothing is violence: Response to Koot et al. (2025).

Fergus O'Leary Simpson, Lorenzo Pellegrini, Olajide Akinleye-Martins, Leif Brottem, Elie Lunanga, Christopher Day, Elias Maombi Ndatabaye, Lara Collart, Naziru Zakari Muhammad, Marijke Verpoorten and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. When everything is violence, nothing is violence: Response to Koot et al. (2025).Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fergus O'Leary SimpsonInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-2182
Lorenzo PellegriniInternational Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Olajide Akinleye-MartinsNorthumbria Law School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Leif BrottemGlobal Development Studies, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa, USA.
Elie LunangaInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Christopher DayPolitical Science Department, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Elias Maombi NdatabayeInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lara CollartInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Naziru Zakari MuhammadYankari Game Reserve, Bauchi, Nigeria.
Marijke VerpoortenInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Helen KopninaNorthumbria Law School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Richard SufoCentre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Funding

Applied Research in Ecology and Social SciencesSustainable Management of Forest Ecosystems in Central Africa (RESSAC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID42360623
PMCPMC13392788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.