ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026
Can we use MRI for timing estimation of rotator cuff tears?
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether routinely assessed MRI features can reliably estimate the timing of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and to assess the performance of an MRI-based logistic regression model in distinguishing recent from chronic tears. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 255 patients with clinically and MRI-confirmed RCT following shoulder trauma underwent MRI between 2011 and 2024. Tears were classified as acute (< 6 weeks), subacute (6-12 weeks), or chronic (> 12 weeks) based on the reported date of trauma; acute and subacute tears were grouped as "recent". Ten predefined MRI features were independently assessed. Univariable diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for each feature. A multivariable Firth-penalized logistic regression model was developed to discriminate recent from chronic tears, with internal validation performed using bootstrap resampling.
resultsAmong the 255 patients (mean age 58.3 years; 65% male), intra-/peri-muscular edema (42% in recent vs 12% in chronic tears) and frayed, hyperintense tendon fibers emerged as independent predictors of recent injury (odds ratios 4.15 and 6.78, respectively). However, traditional markers of chronicity-including fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, tendon retraction, and superior humeral head migration-showed limited discriminative value. The multivariable model demonstrated modest performance, with an ideal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.68. Sensitivity and specificity at the optimal threshold were 56% and 82%, respectively.
conclusionAlthough selected MRI findings are associated with recent RCT, an MRI-based logistic regression model provides limited accuracy for timing estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.