Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360605›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026

Strengthening translational medical research in Ireland: an interdisciplinary framework for clinician-scientist collaboration.

Colin J McMahon, Walter Kolch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin J McMahonDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, CHI Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland. cmcmahon992004@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-9338
Walter KolchSystems Biology Ireland, Conway Institute, UCD, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslational medical research depends on effective collaboration between clinicians and scientists, yet structural, cultural, and funding barriers continue to limit integration. Interdisciplinary communication between these groups remains inconsistent across settings, and challenges in sustaining the clinician-scientist workforce have been increasingly recognised. We outline the case for a National Ecosystem for Discovery (NED) as a potential framework to strengthen collaboration in Ireland while remaining aligned with international research systems.

methodsThis perspective draws on the science of team science, clinician-scientist workforce literature, and existing biomedical research funding models to consider a realistic and phased approach to improving interdisciplinary collaboration.

resultsIreland participates in a range of international biomedical research programmes, including European Union initiatives and all-island training structures such as the Wellcome-HRB ICAT programme. A NED could build on these existing foundations through pilot collaborative hubs, improved interdisciplinary communication, and greater alignment across funding bodies, rather than through the creation of entirely new structures.

conclusionsStrengthening translational medical research in Ireland may depend on improving coordination across existing systems, supporting the clinician-scientist workforce, and enabling sustainable interdisciplinary collaboration. A phased and pragmatic approach may allow such a framework to develop while preserving the diversity of research practices that underpin innovation.

Indexed as

Clinical academic trainingClinician–scientist workforceHealth research policyInterdisciplinary researchIrelandTeam scienceTranslational medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.