ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
The cranioplasty equation: the influence of biomaterials, surgical timing, and frailty on optimising success.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranioplasty outcomes are influenced by multiple perioperative factors, yet the interplay between frailty, surgical timing, and material selection remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterise the independent and combined effects of these variables on postoperative complications. We conducted a retrospective study of 315 patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy between January 2014 and June 2024. Patients were stratified by preoperative frailty using the modified frailty index (mFI: not frail [0], pre-frail [1-2], frail [≥ 3]), timing of reconstruction (early < 90 days, late ≥ 90 days), and implant material (autologous bone graft, synthetic, titanium). Primary outcomes included bone flap depression, skin erosion, infection, postoperative haemorrhage, and new-onset seizures. Cox proportional hazards modelling and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of complications. The cohort comprised 242 males and 73 females with mean age 44.4 years and mean follow-up of 884 days. Increased frailty was associated with higher risk of bone flap depression (HR = 2.091) and postoperative seizures (HR = 1.311). Early cranioplasty resulted in shorter median length of stay (3 vs. 5 days, p = 0.002) but marginally increased seizure risk. Late reconstruction was associated with increased skin erosion risk (HR = 1.018). Both synthetic (HR = 2.065) and titanium (HR = 2.778) materials demonstrated significantly higher infection rates compared to autologous bone grafts. Titanium implants also carried increased seizure risk (HR = 1.801) and longer hospital stays. Reoperation rates were higher in frail patients (HR = 1.891) and those receiving synthetic implants (HR = 1.405). On multiple logistic regression, synthetic (OR = 2.42) and titanium (OR = 3.875) cranioplasties were independently associated with increased infection risk. Increased time to cranioplasty was independently associated with higher odds of skin erosion (OR = 1.002 per day) and bleeding (OR = 1.002 per day), but reduced odds of seizures (OR = 0.998 per day). Cranioplasty outcomes are shaped by the interplay between preoperative frailty, surgical timing, and implant material. These findings support the integration of frailty assessment, timing optimisation, and individualised material selection into a comprehensive preoperative risk-stratification framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.