ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab According to Prior Biologic Exposure in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison of Prior Bevacizumab and Prior Anti-EGFR Cohorts.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRamucirumab plus FOLFIRI is an established second-line treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after oxaliplatin-based first-line therapy. However, real-world data comparing outcomes according to prior biologic exposure are limited.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with mCRC who received second-line FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab after oxaliplatin- and fluoropyrimidine-based first-line therapy combined with either bevacizumab or an anti-EGFR antibody. Efficacy, safety, and subsequent treatment patterns were evaluated.
resultsAmong 135 screened patients, 85 were included: 55 in the prior bevacizumab group and 30 in the prior anti-EGFR group. The prior anti-EGFR group was enriched for RAS wild-type tumors (100.0% vs. 12.7%) and left-sided primary tumors (90.0% vs. 58.2%). The objective response rate was 9.1% versus 33.3%, median progression-free survival was 6.1 versus 7.9 months, and median overall survival was 19.8 months (95% CI, 14.0-27.5) versus 31.5 months (95% CI, 11.0-37.8), respectively. Adverse events were manageable in both groups, without a marked increase in severe proteinuria in the prior bevacizumab group.
conclusionSecond-line FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab showed clinically meaningful activity and manageable toxicity after either prior biologic strategy. The more favorable outcomes observed in the prior anti-EGFR cohort should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating because of baseline biologic imbalance and potential confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360560What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.