Observational studyOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Intraoperative C-arm CBCT versus early postoperative MRI for the assessment of fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material positioning in cranio-maxillofacial trauma surgery.
Observational study in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07012850 (Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Perioperative Evaluation of Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Perioperative Evaluation of Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with dedicated in-house-optimized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, including CT-like and metal artifact reduction sequences (MARS), using a novel 15-channel coil for the evaluation of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and the depiction of plates and screws.
methodsFifteen patients (13 men, 2 women; median age, 32 years; range, 18-65 years) with acute cranio-maxillofacial fractures underwent surgical treatment with intraoperative CBCT, followed by early postoperative MRI within 36 h. MRI protocols included 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE), slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and 3D double-echo steady-state (DESS). Two independent maxillofacial surgeons performed qualitative and quantitative evaluations of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and implant morphology using a 5-point visual scale (5 = best; 1 = non-assessable) and dimensional measurements. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inter-reader agreement was assessed using weighted kappa (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
resultsUTE and SEMAC sequences provided excellent CT-like performance in visualizing fracture reduction and implant positioning (median 5, IQR 5-5 and 4-5, respectively), with minimal absolute differences in quantitative measurements and substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.75-1.0; ICC = 0.89-0.99; all p < 0.001). In contrast, DESS demonstrated limited utility for assessing metallic implants due to pronounced signal voids and susceptibility artifacts.
conclusionUTE and SEMAC provide high-quality, radiation-free imaging for evaluating fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. These techniques demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance to intraoperative CBCT in a postoperative setting. They may serve as a radiation-free alternative for perioperative imaging in younger patients with anticipated repeated imaging needs, pending prospective intraoperative validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850, Registration date: May 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.