ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
The use of partially slatted floor designs as an alternative to littered systems in broiler chickens. II. The effects on welfare and behavioral traits.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of different flooring designs on the welfare and behavioral traits in fast-growing broilers. A total of 600 day-old Ross-308 chickens were randomly allocated to five treatment groups: fully littered (FL), fully slatted (FS), and combined systems with varying slatted floor ratios (1/3SF, 1/2SF, and 2/3SF). Welfare parameters, including body defects, gait score, and tonic immobility (TI), along with behavioral activities, were assessed. Results indicated that hock burn and breast skin burn scores were significantly higher in male birds and increased with the proportion of slatted flooring (p < 0.001). Conversely, the FS and high-ratio slatted groups exhibited significantly better body cleanliness and breast feathering scores compared to the FL group. While gait scores were generally poorer in males, the floor design significantly influenced walking ability (p = 0.05), with higher impairment observed in FS males. TI duration did not differ significantly among treatments. Behavioral observations revealed that the FL system promoted active behaviors, particularly foraging and locomotion (p < 0.001). In contrast, the FS system inhibited natural behaviors such as dust bathing and foraging, leading to increased preening and passive behaviors. In conclusion, while slatted floor systems offers advantages in hygiene and cleanliness, it negatively impacts leg health and restricts the expression of natural behaviors. Partially slatted floor systems presented intermediate results but did not fully mitigate the welfare trade-offs associated with slatted systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.