ArticleOecologia2026
Soil microbial drought history affects physiological response of select tree species to drought stress.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The HD-Zip II Transcription FactorAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil microbes aid in the drought tolerance of plants, yet the extent to which a microbial community's previous drought exposure can affect plant responses to contemporary drought is largely unknown. To address this gap using a greenhouse experiment, we planted saplings of three eastern hardwoods (Prunus virginiana, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Quercus rubra) in field soils exposed to experimentally-induced drought or ambient moisture. Then, we altered the watering regime of the pots to induce contemporary drought (or no water stress) and measured several physiological responses. In pots containing soils with no drought history, contemporary drought reduced C assimilation rates, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in all tree species, as expected. However, in pots containing soils with a drought history, one species - P. virginiana - was buffered from the effects of contemporary drought, displaying no drought-induced changes in physiology. The buffering effect of the soil drought history treatment also affected soluble sugars, which increased to a lesser degree (in response to contemporary drought) than in soils with no drought history. These effects were not apparent in the other two species. Sterilized soils suggest that the soil drought history effect on some physiological variables in P. virginiana likely resulted from drought-induced responses of soil microbes as opposed to soil physical or chemical changes. Collectively, our results indicate that in addition to plant hydraulic traits, the physiological responses of some tree species to drought may depend, in part, on plant-soil-microbe interactions shaped by past stress exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.