Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360462›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2026

The crucible of resilience: hormesis as the unifying principle of evolution, genetics, and epigenetics.

Edward J Calabrese, Evgenios Agathokleous

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward J CalabreseDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Morrill I, N344, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Evgenios AgathokleousSchool of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu, China. evgenios@nuist.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0058-4857

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42577319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional linear no-threshold model of toxicity and stress fails to capture the complex, adaptive nature of biological systems. Hormesis-a biphasic dose-response phenomenon where low-dose stress induces beneficial, adaptive responses while high doses cause harm-offers a more comprehensive paradigm. This article asserts that hormesis is a major, unifying explanatory principle of life that efficiently integrates evolutionary theory, genetics, and epigenetics. From an evolutionary perspective, hormesis is an energy-efficient strategy of adaptive homeostasis, permitting organisms to build biological capital during mild hardships/stresses to survive subsequent acute or chronic environmentally and/or age-related life-threatening challenges. Mechanistically, this survival strategy is hardwired into the genome via highly conserved stress-response networks (e.g., Nrf2, FOXO, Sirtuins) that upregulate cytoprotective pathways upon the detection of mild stressors. Furthermore, epigenetics provides the temporal bridge, recording these stress events via chromatin remodeling to create a lasting 'memory' of resilience, which may even be transmitted transgenerationally to prime/adapt offspring for future adversity. Ultimately, synthesizing these three biological domains through the lens of hormesis redefines biomedically based understandings of health, aging, and disease, demonstrating that biological resilience is actively maintained through manageable environmental and age-related challenges rather than the absence of stress.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEpigenesis, GeneticHormesisAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsHomeostasisHumansStress, PhysiologicalAdaptive homeostasisBiological resilienceHealthStress response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.