ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Natural disasters and suicidality in Australia: a systematic review.
Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo systematically review Australian evidence examining associations between exposure to natural disasters and suicidal behaviours, including suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide mortality.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with a pre-registered protocol (CRD42023471489), PRISMA, and SwiMS guidelines. Databases were searched in May 2026. Eligible studies were Australian observational studies examining droughts, floods, bushfires, heatwaves, or storms in relation to suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or death by suicide. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Findings were narratively synthesised.
resultsTwelve studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence linking natural disasters to suicide mortality was mixed and inconsistent, particularly in short-term post-disaster analyses. In contrast, individual-level studies more consistently reported increased odds of suicidal ideation and self-harm following disaster exposure. Associations were strongest for prolonged drought, heat exposure, displacement, and cumulative or repeated disaster exposure, with several studies demonstrating dose response patterns. Most studies were judged to have moderate risk of bias, commonly due to exposure misclassification and limited control of confounding variables.
conclusionIn Australia, natural disasters are more consistently associated with non-fatal suicidal behaviours than with suicide mortality. Post-disaster mental health responses should incorporate monitoring of these behaviours beyond the immediate recovery phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.