ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Clinical and serological predictors of autoimmune etiology in patients with interstitial lung disease: a 10-year retrospective study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInterstitial lung disease (ILD) may represent the first manifestation of an underlying autoimmune disorder. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) among patients referred for rheumatologic evaluation, and to identify clinical predictors of autoimmune etiology.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 226 consecutive patients diagnosed with ILD between 2010 and 2020 and referred to the Rheumatology clinic for etiological assessment. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory and imaging findings were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine independent factors associated with autoimmune interstitial lung disease (AI-ILD), defined as CTD-ILD or IPAF. To address potential circularity and incorporation bias, five pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsAmong the study population, 50.9% were classified as AI-ILD (30.1% CTD-ILD and 20.8% IPAF), while 49.1% had non-rheumatologic ILD. Sjögren's disease was the most common underlying rheumatic disease (41.1%). A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern was present in 49% of patients. In multivariable analysis, ocular involvement (dry eye confirmed on ophthalmologic examination; OR 8.884, 95% CI 3.475-22.712, p<0.001) and ANA positivity (any titer; OR 4.163, 95% CI 2.114-8.197, p<0.001) were independently associated with autoimmune etiology. Absence of comorbidities was also independently associated (OR 2.052, 95% CI 1.093-3.852, p=0.025). High-titer ANA (titer≥1:320) was observed exclusively in AI-ILD patients (0/111 non-rheumatologic vs 69/115 AI-ILD). These findings were consistent across all five sensitivity analyses (AUC range 0.710-0.857).
conclusionsAmong patients referred for rheumatologic evaluation, autoimmune etiologies accounted for approximately half of ILD cases. Confirmed ocular involvement and ANA positivity were independently associated with autoimmune ILD across all model specifications and five pre-specified sensitivity analyses. These data support their use in clinical triage within similar referral settings. Key Points • High Prevalence of Autoimmunity: Nearly half of the patients referred for rheumatologic evaluation following an ILD diagnosis were found to have an underlying autoimmune etiology. • The Dominance of Sjögren's: Contrary to some previous reports, Sjögren's disease emerged as the most frequent connective tissue disease in this cohort, likely reflecting the value of systematic sicca screening. • Consistent Predictors: Confirmed ocular involvement and ANA positivity were independently associated with AI-ILD across five sensitivity analyses in this referral population. • The 1:320 Threshold: High-titer ANA (≥1:320) appeared exclusively in AI-ILD patients in this cohort. This finding requires external validation before it can inform broader clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.