Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360394›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Eloise Pedersen, Craig B Stanford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eloise PedersenUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. eloisepe@usc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9116-2266
Craig B StanfordUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4034-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social learning is essential to the development of culture in humans, non-human primates, and other cultural species. Transmission biases (social learning strategies), the cognitive processes that guide conscious and subconscious decisions about when and from whom to learn, are a key branch of social learning. Primatological research has primarily explored single biases in isolation, such as chimpanzee bias toward adopting behavior demonstrated by higher-ranking individuals. However, few studies have considered how simultaneous strategies interact when subjects are given a conflicting choice involving two potentially adaptive biases. This study used a token-reward task with 35 sanctuary-housed chimpanzees at Ngamba Island Sanctuary in Uganda to determine whether chimpanzees more frequently adopt behaviors from high- or low-ranking female demonstrators when those behaviors differ in payoff, providing either a preferred pineapple piece (high-payoff) or a less favored carrot piece (low-payoff). Individuals in Group 1 observed a low-ranking demonstrator collecting the high-payoff reward (pineapple) and a high-ranking demonstrator collecting the low-payoff reward (carrot). Chimpanzees in Group 1 did not adopt one behavior significantly more frequently than the other. In Group 2, the demonstrator roles were reversed, and the frequency of high-payoff selection was higher. This suggests that high-payoff behaviors are more likely to propagate when presented by higher-ranking demonstrators. Additionally, adoption of high-payoff behaviors may be constrained by the presence of alternative, lower-payoff behaviors demonstrated by socially preferred individuals. In turn, this may contribute to explanations of why chimpanzee culture is relatively simple compared to that of humans.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPan troglodytesSocial LearningAnimalsFemaleMaleRewardSocial BehaviorUgandaChimpanzeePayoffRankSocial learningTransmission bias

Identifiers

PMID42360394
PMCPMC13582275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.