ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social learning is essential to the development of culture in humans, non-human primates, and other cultural species. Transmission biases (social learning strategies), the cognitive processes that guide conscious and subconscious decisions about when and from whom to learn, are a key branch of social learning. Primatological research has primarily explored single biases in isolation, such as chimpanzee bias toward adopting behavior demonstrated by higher-ranking individuals. However, few studies have considered how simultaneous strategies interact when subjects are given a conflicting choice involving two potentially adaptive biases. This study used a token-reward task with 35 sanctuary-housed chimpanzees at Ngamba Island Sanctuary in Uganda to determine whether chimpanzees more frequently adopt behaviors from high- or low-ranking female demonstrators when those behaviors differ in payoff, providing either a preferred pineapple piece (high-payoff) or a less favored carrot piece (low-payoff). Individuals in Group 1 observed a low-ranking demonstrator collecting the high-payoff reward (pineapple) and a high-ranking demonstrator collecting the low-payoff reward (carrot). Chimpanzees in Group 1 did not adopt one behavior significantly more frequently than the other. In Group 2, the demonstrator roles were reversed, and the frequency of high-payoff selection was higher. This suggests that high-payoff behaviors are more likely to propagate when presented by higher-ranking demonstrators. Additionally, adoption of high-payoff behaviors may be constrained by the presence of alternative, lower-payoff behaviors demonstrated by socially preferred individuals. In turn, this may contribute to explanations of why chimpanzee culture is relatively simple compared to that of humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.