Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360363›Full record

ReviewJournal of biological physics2026

Multiscale frameworks for exploring protein energy landscapes: advances in theory and simulation.

Patryk Adam Wesołowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biological physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patryk Adam WesołowskiYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK. paw61@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-980X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy landscape theory provides a unifying framework for describing protein structure, dynamics, and function across hierarchies of spatial and temporal scales. In practice, however, protein energy landscapes are never accessed directly; they are represented through a hierarchy of theoretical models, from quantum mechanical potential energy surfaces to coarse-grained potentials of mean force. Each level of description entails a systematic reduction of degrees of freedom and a corresponding transformation of the underlying landscape. In this review, we examine how protein energy landscape representations change under successive approximations to the molecular Hamiltonian, with particular emphasis on the emergence, interpretation, and robustness of landscape concepts across scales. We argue that many simplified models succeed not because they reproduce microscopic interactions in detail, but because key topological features of the landscape, such as funnels, barriers, and competing basins, are preserved under projection. This article also clarifies the physical principles underlying coarse-graining, solvent modelling, and multilevel simulation strategies and demonstrates why energy landscape theory remains predictive despite reduced chemical resolution, highlighting its role as a unifying framework for exploring biomolecular space.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsModels, MolecularQuantum MechanicsThermodynamicsProteinsEnergy landscapesMultiscale frameworksPotential energy surfacesProteins

Identifiers

PMID42360363
PMCPMC13309589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.