Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360351›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

CT-derived hepatic extracellular volume fraction for the assessment of graft rejection after liver transplantation: a retrospective observational study.

Luigi Asmundo, Virginia Pansini, Caterina Beatrice Monti, Andrea Vanzulli, Francesco Rizzetto, Leonardo Mariani, Domenico Albano, Angelo Vanzulli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luigi AsmundoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy. luigi.asmundo@ospedaleniguarda.it.
Virginia PansiniPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Caterina Beatrice MontiDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Andrea VanzulliDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Francesco RizzettoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Leonardo MarianiDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Angelo VanzulliDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of hepatic extracellular volume (ECV) fraction derived from delayed single-energy CT for identifying graft rejection in liver transplant recipients and its added value over clinical parameters. This retrospective observational study included consecutive adult liver transplant recipients with available unenhanced and delayed (3-5-min) contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Hepatic ECV was calculated using regions of interest in the liver parenchyma and abdominal aorta, corrected for hematocrit. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of graft rejection. ECV values were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression models were constructed to assess predictors of rejection. To avoid multicollinearity, separate MELD-based and laboratory-based clinical models were evaluated, and ECV was added to each model to assess its incremental value. Model performance was evaluated by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Eighty-four liver transplant recipients were included (21 with rejection and 63 without). Median ECV was 32.4% in the rejection group and 28.7% in the non-rejection group (P = 0.100). ECV alone demonstrated limited diagnostic performance (AUC 0.62). A MELD-based clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.73, which minimally increased to 0.74 after adding ECV (ΔAUC = 0.009; bootstrap P = 0.180). A laboratory-based model achieved an AUC of 0.72 and remained unchanged after adding ECV (ΔAUC = 0.0005; bootstrap P = 1.000). Hepatic ECV derived from delayed CT was not significantly associated with graft rejection and did not improve the diagnostic performance of either MELD-based or laboratory-based clinical models. Despite prior evidence linking increased ECV to hepatic injury and fibrosis, our findings suggest that ECV may not be sensitive to the complex and multifactorial processes underlying graft rejection in liver transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Delayed-phase CTExtracellular volume fractionGraft rejectionHepatic ECVLiver graft dysfunctionLiver transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.