ArticleInternational journal of paediatric dentistry2026
Microstructural Analysis of Carious Lesion Progression Beneath Hall Technique and Conventional Stainless-Steel Crowns in Children.
Article in International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStainless-steel crowns (SSC) are a common restorative option for preserving tooth tissue damaged by caries in primary molars. The Hall Technique (HT) is an SSC restorative approach using no local anaesthesia, tooth preparation or caries removal.
aimTo compare carious lesion progression, biomechanical and chemical properties in exfoliated primary molars treated with HT and conventional SSC.
designA descriptive laboratory study was conducted with teeth treated with HT SSC and conventional SSC (control).
resultsRadiographic lesion progression was observed in half of the samples, occurring in 47% of HT SSCs and 55% of conventional SSC. The concentration of P and Ca or minor elements such as Na and Mg was similar between HT SSC and conventional SSC. Hardness values of enamel, dentine and carious lesion were slightly lower for HT SSC than conventional SSCs. Elastic modulus values for enamel and dentine were slightly higher in conventional SSC, while HT SSC had higher elastic modulus for the lesion.
conclusionTeeth treated with HT SSCs and conventional SSCs demonstrated similar lesion progression, elemental composition and mechanical properties, suggesting no clear differences between the treatment approaches within the limitations of the sample size and design of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.