ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Reduced Image Quality Impairs Monocular Blur-Driven Accommodation in Keratoconus.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) monocular blur-driven accommodation is attenuated in keratoconus due to weaker defocus-blur signals arising from degraded image quality (IQ) compared with non-keratoconic controls, and (2) manipulating the strength of defocus-blur signal, either by correcting higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in keratoconus or by inducing keratoconic HOAs in controls, will correspondingly improve or degrade accommodative performance. Methods: Monochromatic IQ degradation was computed from HOAs of 15 mild-to-moderate keratoconic participants (13-29 years) and 15 controls for a 4.5-mm pupil diameter. Participants monocularly accommodated to 0.5 to 4.0 diopter (D) hyperopic step changes whereas their lower-order aberrations (LOAs) or both LOAs and HOAs were corrected using an adaptive optics visual simulator. The protocol was repeated in 10 controls with induced HOAs from one moderate keratoconic eye. Results: IQ loss with induced blur was significantly lower in patients with keratoconus than in healthy controls (P < 0.001). Accommodative responses were reduced in keratoconus (0.6 ± 0.9 D across the 4-D range) compared with controls (2.6 ± 1.1 D, P < 0.01) and were correlated with the corresponding IQ loss (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). Although IQ improved with combined LOA + HOA correction in keratoconus, no significant change in accommodation was observed (P = 0.58). Inducing keratoconic HOAs, however, significantly attenuated accommodation in controls (0.27 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Reduced monocular accommodation is consistent with weakened defocus-blur signals available to drive these responses in keratoconic eyes. The absence of improvement in accommodation despite optical quality enhancement may indicate a limited role of pure defocus as an accommodative cue and/or reduced neural sensitivity to blur following chronically degraded retinal images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.