Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360096›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Reduced Image Quality Impairs Monocular Blur-Driven Accommodation in Keratoconus.

Tithi Bhakta, Ketakee Jain, Priyanka Sudanabonia, Santiago Sager, Adrian Gambin, Pablo Artal, Shrikant R Bharadwaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tithi BhaktaBrien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Telangana, India.
Ketakee JainBrien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Telangana, India.
Priyanka SudanaboniaCataract and Refractive Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Santiago SagerLaboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia (Región de Murcia), Spain.
Adrian GambinLaboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia (Región de Murcia), Spain.
Pablo ArtalLaboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia (Región de Murcia), Spain.
Shrikant R BharadwajBrien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) monocular blur-driven accommodation is attenuated in keratoconus due to weaker defocus-blur signals arising from degraded image quality (IQ) compared with non-keratoconic controls, and (2) manipulating the strength of defocus-blur signal, either by correcting higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in keratoconus or by inducing keratoconic HOAs in controls, will correspondingly improve or degrade accommodative performance. Methods: Monochromatic IQ degradation was computed from HOAs of 15 mild-to-moderate keratoconic participants (13-29 years) and 15 controls for a 4.5-mm pupil diameter. Participants monocularly accommodated to 0.5 to 4.0 diopter (D) hyperopic step changes whereas their lower-order aberrations (LOAs) or both LOAs and HOAs were corrected using an adaptive optics visual simulator. The protocol was repeated in 10 controls with induced HOAs from one moderate keratoconic eye. Results: IQ loss with induced blur was significantly lower in patients with keratoconus than in healthy controls (P < 0.001). Accommodative responses were reduced in keratoconus (0.6 ± 0.9 D across the 4-D range) compared with controls (2.6 ± 1.1 D, P < 0.01) and were correlated with the corresponding IQ loss (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). Although IQ improved with combined LOA + HOA correction in keratoconus, no significant change in accommodation was observed (P = 0.58). Inducing keratoconic HOAs, however, significantly attenuated accommodation in controls (0.27 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Reduced monocular accommodation is consistent with weakened defocus-blur signals available to drive these responses in keratoconic eyes. The absence of improvement in accommodation despite optical quality enhancement may indicate a limited role of pure defocus as an accommodative cue and/or reduced neural sensitivity to blur following chronically degraded retinal images.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularKeratoconusVision, MonocularAdolescentAdultCorneal Wavefront AberrationFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42360096
PMCPMC13326837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.