ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Distinct Tear Element Signatures in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Identified by Particle-Induced X-Ray Emission.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the etiology of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) by characterizing the elemental composition of tear and blood samples from affected patients. Methods: Tear samples were prospectively collected from each eye of adults with PANDO and matched controls using Schirmer strips. Fingertip blood was obtained using the same absorbent material. Samples were analyzed with particle-induced x-ray emission (PIXE) to quantify multi-element profiles. Statistical analysis included paired testing for intraindividual comparisons in unilateral PANDO, independent-group comparisons between PANDO and controls, and multivariate methods to assess overall group separation. Results: Participants included 15 patients with PANDO and 15 controls (14 females each), with mean ages of 57.29 ± 15.35 and 53.27 ± 14.89 years, respectively. Twelve elements were detected in tears and 11 in blood. Compared with controls, the PANDO group had significantly (P < 0.05) higher tear levels of sodium (Na) and chlorine (Cl) in both affected and unaffected eyes, and higher phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) levels in unaffected eyes. There were no significant differences between affected and unaffected eyes in unilateral PANDO. In blood, only copper (Cu) differed significantly between groups. Multivariate analyses demonstrated clear group separation in tears but not blood profiles. Conclusions: Patients with PANDO have a distinct tear elemental signature characterized by high Na levels. Our findings suggest that bilateral biochemical alterations may precede clinically detectable obstruction and that PANDO is a product of local ocular processes rather than systemic influences. Tear elemental analysis is a promising noninvasive approach for detecting early or subclinical changes in PANDO and improving understanding of its pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.