ArticleJournal of vision2026
Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Closed captions, originally for hearing-impaired audiences, are now increasingly used, adding an additional visual element to the multisensory experience of movie viewing. This study examines how gaze behavior adapts to the absence of auditory information by testing whether increased caption engagement reflects more frequent switching between closed captions and the visual scene, longer uninterrupted reading intervals, or both. Using eye-tracking, we analyzed saccades and fixations in designated areas of interest as participants viewed a 20-minute movie with alternating presence and absence of audio. Viewers integrated the two visual input streams by frequently shifting their gaze between the captions and the scene. The balance between reading captions and watching visuals shifts in the absence of sound by adjusting transition probabilities (i.e., increasing gaze switching between captions and scene, rather than changing the duration of reading intervals). This suggests that increased caption engagement in the absence of sound reflects more frequent sampling of captions, rather than longer uninterrupted reading. Modeling the probabilistic characteristics of fixations and saccades revealed more consistent and focused eye movement patterns on the caption text compared to the visual scene, highlighting distinct reading and gazing behaviours. Notably, these differences remained stable regardless of the presence or absence of sound. In addition to the availability of audio, we observed the presence of dialogue and the emotional content also influence caption engagement. These findings highlight how viewers adapt to missing audio through more frequent switching between text and scene while maintaining low-level properties of eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.