ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Diagnostic performance and interchangeability of two commercial anti-RSV-IgG and IgA ELISAs across clinically relevant populations.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-specific antibodies has gained importance following the introduction of RSV vaccines and long-acting monoclonal antibody prophylaxis. However, the analytical performance and interchangeability of commercially available RSV-ELISAs remain insufficiently defined, leaving uncertainty about their reliability for clinical diagnostic practice. We performed a head-to-head comparison of the widely used commercial Euroimmun- and Virotech‒ELISA for detection of total anti-RSV‒IgG and IgA in 462 sera from four cohorts: healthy adults (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.