ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Mechanisms and scales in modeling forest responses to changing disturbance regimes.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural disturbances are major drivers of large-scale forest dynamics. However, the representation of forest disturbances remains oversimplified and poorly constrained in terrestrial biosphere models, compromising predictive performance under rapidly changing disturbance regimes. In this review, we first summarize the general mechanisms underlying vegetation responses to major disturbance agents across spatio-temporal scales, including occurrence regimes, immediate structural impacts, post-disturbance community reorganization, and long-term ecosystem feedbacks. Predictable patterns of the processes provide the ecological foundation of disturbance modeling. Subsequently, we synthesize progress and challenges toward more mechanistic disturbance modeling, organized by three generic modules: occurrence, impact, and post-disturbance dynamics. Future model developments should implement dynamic disturbance regimes, model lethal and nonlethal structural damage with trait-based hazard functions, and represent key ecological processes determining post-disturbance ecosystem dynamics - including different regeneration strategies, trait plasticity in response to rapid microenvironmental changes, and disturbance legacy effects. Finally, we discuss observational constraints on mechanistic disturbance models. Model parameterization and development can benefit from advancing disturbance detection and attribution via multi-modal and multi-platform remote sensing, ground measurements, and disturbance manipulation experiments. Altogether, mechanistic, scalable, and observation-constrained simulation of disturbance is essential for reducing uncertainties in forecasting global change impacts on ecosystems and carbon cycle feedbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.