ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2026
Surgical repair of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated full-thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 10 cats.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe the clinical presentation, surgical management, complications and outcomes of cats with gastrointestinal (GI) ulcer perforation associated with recent administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids or both.MethodsA retrospective review of medical records from five UK referral hospitals was conducted between 2009 and 2024. Cats were included if they underwent surgical correction of GI ulceration within 14 days of NSAID and/or corticosteroid administration.ResultsA total of 10 cats met the inclusion criteria. The proximal duodenum was the most common site of perforation (n = 6/10), followed by the gastric body (n = 2/10). Surgical techniques varied and included primary repair (n = 5/10), Y-U pyloroplasty (n = 2/10), enterectomy (n = 2/10) and partial gastrectomy (n = 1/10). All cats survived the immediate postoperative period; however, one cat did not survive to discharge (median hospitalisation time 6 days [range 3-15]). Short-term complications were noted in three cats: one death (sepsis 9 days postoperatively) and three mild complications, with two of these complications occurring in the same cat. Long-term complications were noted in one cat (severe ulcerative duodenopathy and euthanased 16 days postoperatively). Long-term follow-up (median 928 days [range 9-1215]) revealed that 5/10 cats remained alive at study completion. Two deaths (n = 2/10) were attributed to GI ulcer-related complications.Conclusions and relevanceGI perforation secondary to recent NSAID or corticosteroid administration in cats carries a favourable prognosis after surgical correction. Despite the high-risk nature of GI perforation, the majority of cats survived to discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.