ArticleJournal of global health2026
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of new treatment strategies for the management of young infants with low- or moderate-mortality risk signs of possible serious bacterial infection: framework and study methodology for randomised controlled trials in six countries across Africa and Asia.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) is coordinating two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) across three sites in Africa (Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Tanzania) and four in Asia (one in Bangladesh, two in India, and one in Pakistan) to generate evidence on the optimal place of treatment for young infants (YIs) with a single low-mortality risk sign of possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) and switching antibiotic therapy from injectable to oral in YIs with moderate-mortality risk signs of PSBI. We present the framework and methodology used to compare the costs and evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of these strategies. Methods: Cost analysis will be conducted from societal (hospital and household) perspectives. Hospital medical costs (staff, medicines, and consumables) and operational costs (inpatient bed costs, non-consumables, training, and communication) will be collected through hospital surveys. Household costs, including medical payments for treatment (registration, consultations, medications, consumables) and non-medical costs (transport, food, and wage loss), will be collected through household surveys. In both RCTs, combined hospital and household (including medical and non-medical) costs for all randomised sick YIs (SYIs) will be used, with an intention-to-treat approach, to calculate the cost per SYI in each study arm. Effectiveness measures, based on the absence of adverse outcomes, will be used to determine incremental CE ratios and incremental net benefits. Separate societal and payer/provider perspectives will be considered, and site-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds will be estimated. The household's medical and non-medical costs, along with their share of societal costs, will estimate the household burden per treated child. Conclusions: This CE framework will evaluate thresholds for new PSBI treatment strategies in YIs, integrating health system and household perspectives. It will seek to identify safe, cost-effective approaches to reduce economic burdens, inform national budgetary impact, and potentially prompt WHO guideline revisions to improve infant care in low-resource settings globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.