SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Surgeon experience in hip arthroscopy improves operative efficiency and reduces conversion to total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHip arthroscopy (HAS) is technically demanding, and surgeon's experience may influence outcomes. However, the magnitude and domain-specific effects of the learning curve remain unclear.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251185937). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched through 31 December 2025 for studies comparing early versus late experience phases in HAS. Random-effects meta-analyses (Sidik-Jonkman estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment) were performed for operative and traction time, patient-reported outcomes, complications, revision arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
resultsEighteen studies (2624 procedures; 1291 early and 1333 late cases) were included. Late cases showed significantly shorter operative time (-31.77 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] -51.40 to -12.14) and traction time (-15.67 min; 95% CI -25.42 to -5.92), with substantial heterogeneity. Functional outcomes favoured late experience, including higher improvement in minimal clinically important difference units (0.58; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.99) and modest gains in modified Harris Hip Score (2.78 points; 95% CI 0.16 to 5.41) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (8.41 points; 95% CI 1.99 to 14.83). Complication rates and revision arthroscopy did not differ significantly, whereas conversion to THA was lower in late cases (odds ratio [OR] 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.98). Most studies were at moderate to serious risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was low to very low.
conclusionSurgeon experience in HAS is associated with improved operative efficiency and modest functional gains, while safety outcomes remain largely unchanged. The lower THA conversion rate in late cases may reflect improved patient selection and decision-making, although confidence is limited by study design and heterogeneity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III systematic review and meta-analysis of predominantly retrospective cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.