Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359702›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2026

[Expression of Concern] TIP60 governs the auto‑ubiquitination of UHRF1 through USP7 dissociation from the UHRF1/USP7 complex.

Tanveer Ahmad, Waseem Ashraf, Abdulkhaleg Ibrahim, Liliyana Zaayter, Christian D Muller, Ali Hamiche, Yves Mély, Christian Bronner, Marc Mousli

Abstract readExpression of Concern
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanveer AhmadLaboratory of Bioimaging and Pathologies, CNRS UMR‑7021, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.
Waseem AshrafLaboratory of Bioimaging and Pathologies, CNRS UMR‑7021, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.
Abdulkhaleg IbrahimInstitute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC), INSERM U1258 CNRS UMR 7104, University of Strasbourg, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Liliyana ZaayterLaboratory of Bioimaging and Pathologies, CNRS UMR‑7021, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.
Christian D MullerHubert Curien Pluridisciplinary Institute (IPHC), CNRS UMR‑7178, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.
Ali HamicheInstitute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC), INSERM U1258 CNRS UMR 7104, University of Strasbourg, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Yves MélyLaboratory of Bioimaging and Pathologies, CNRS UMR‑7021, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.
Christian BronnerInstitute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC), INSERM U1258 CNRS UMR 7104, University of Strasbourg, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Marc MousliLaboratory of Bioimaging and Pathologies, CNRS UMR‑7021, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that the GAPDH control western blots shown in Fig. 5A on p. 9 for the experiments without MG132 treatment ('‑ MMGM132') were strikingly similar to the GAPDH control western blots shown in Fig. 5D, albeit with some horizontal and vertical resizing of the bands. In addition, an independent analysis of the data in this paper revealed that the flow cytometric plots for the TIP60‑transfected cells experiment in Fig. 8B on p. 12 were also strikingly similar to the plots shown to represent the TIP60‑eGFP Positive cells experiment in Fig. 8E. The authors have been contacted by the Editorial Office to offer an explanation for the apparent re‑use of the abovementioned data in this paper, and we are awaiting their response. Owing to the fact that the Editorial Office has been made aware of potential issues surrounding the scientific integrity of this paper, we are issuing an Expression of Concern to notify readers of this potential problem while the Editorial Office continues to investigate this matter further. [International Journal of Oncology 59: 89, 2021; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5269].

Indexed as

Lysine Acetyltransferase 5Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsHumansUbiquitinationCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsKAT5 protein, humanLysine Acetyltransferase 5Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesUHRF1 protein, humanapoptosiscancerepigeneticsfluorescence lifetime imaging microscopyprotein‑protein interactionTIP60ubiquitinationUHRF1USP7

Identifiers

PMID42359702
PMCPMC13344292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.