Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359695›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2026

Evaluation of Postblock Hypersensitivity Using Quantitative Sensory Testing before, during, and after Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Resolution in Healthy Volunteers.

Yun-Yun K Chen, Jenna M Wilson, Patrick W Collins, Sheila R Gokul, Philipp Lirk, Kristin L Schreiber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun-Yun K ChenYun-Yun K. Chen, M.D.: Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-3770-2749
Jenna M WilsonJenna M. Wilson, Ph.D.: Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-0467
Patrick W CollinsPatrick W. Collins, B.S.: Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0008-0869-8155
Sheila R GokulSheila R. Gokul, M.D.: Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9980-955
Philipp LirkPhilipp Lirk, M.D., Ph.D.: Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9306-7535
Kristin L SchreiberKristin L. Schreiber, M.D., Ph.D.: Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-2214

Funding

Research Training for AnesthetistsT32GM007592 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STUART A FORMAN · 1985 to 2026
$11.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe problem of a sharp increase in pain after resolution of a nerve block, known as rebound pain, has been increasingly recognized. It is currently unknown whether rebound pain simply reflects the unmasking of untreated, residual surgical pain, or if it represents a de novo hyperalgesic state driven by a mechanistic resetting of pain thresholds in response to regional anesthesia. In this study, the authors assessed nociceptive processing after a single-injection axillary brachial plexus block in healthy volunteers to detect whether a previously blocked arm displayed objective hypersensitivity in the absence of surgical pain.

methodsHealthy volunteers received a single-injection axillary brachial plexus block using 15 cc mepivacaine 1.5%, with their contralateral unblocked arm serving as a control. Pain sensitivity between arms was compared using a range of quantitative sensory testing, comparing punctate, pressure, and heat pain using paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The primary outcome was heat pain threshold to 1 of 10 pain, compared between previously blocked and control arms at 60 min after motor resolution (MR), with secondary outcomes being other modalities compared at this timepoint. Additionally, the authors explored differences in maximally sensitized values during the entire postblock period.

resultsAll 40 participants (age 19 to 64 yr, 60% female) completed the study. At 60 min after MR, heat pain threshold to 1 of 10 pain was not significantly different between arms (block, 40.8° ± 2.2°C; control, 41.2° ± 2.6°C; P = 0.160). Testing of several other sensory modalities revealed only a slightly lower temperature to reach 5 of 10 heat pain in the block versus control arm. When examining the maximally sensitized values including 3 h after MR, the control arm showed greater sensitivity in some tested modalities (punctate pain threshold and painful after sensations) but not others (heat and pressure pain thresholds and tolerances, temporal summation of pain).

conclusionsMultimodal pain testing revealed no evidence of general postblock hypersensitivity during resolution of a single-injection axillary brachial plexus block.

Indexed as

Brachial Plexus BlockHyperalgesiaPain MeasurementPain ThresholdAdultAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMepivacaineMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalMepivacaine

Identifiers

PMID42359695
PMCPMC13445557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.