ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Trauma-informed conversational agents for mental health: understanding user perspectives and experiences.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health conversational agents (MHCAs) offer scalable, accessible psychological support yet raise concerns about safety and appropriateness for trauma, exposed users. While trauma-informed care (TIC) principles, emphasizing safety, trust, empowerment, collaboration, peer support, and cultural sensitivity, are well-established in clinical practice, their application and user interpretation in chatbot contexts remain unexplored. This study aimed to explore (1) how users conceptualize trauma-informed care in the context of mental health chatbots and (2) what factors can help us predict whether users perceive their chatbot interaction as trauma-informed. Methods: A 59-item web-based survey (REDCap) assessed demographics, technology proficiency, adverse life experiences, chatbot usage, and TIC perceptions among 606 participants recruited via ClickWorker, social media, and MyChart. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified latent TIC domains. Multivariable logistic regression determined predictors of trauma-informed perception. Results: High satisfaction (84.5%) and trauma-informed perception (92.9%) were reported. Factor analyses validated a five-domain structure: Trust & Transparency, Data Safety, Empowerment, Peer Support, and Cultural Sensitivity (CFI = 0.978; RMSEA = 0.045). Trust (OR = 3.89, Discussion: This study provides empirical foundation for measuring trauma-informed design in MHCAs. Trust-building, emotional validation, and peer connection significantly shape user perceptions. Findings emphasize the necessity of aligning AI-based mental health tools with trauma-informed principles to enhance therapeutic safety, credibility, and inclusivity across diverse user populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.