ArticleBiodiversity data journal2026
Environmental drivers of Odonate assemblages across biogeographic provinces in the Mexican Transition Zone.
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study shows how the different environments and biogeographical provinces in the Mexican Transition Zone influence the structure of odonate communities. Through sampling conducted in 2024 across lentic and lotic habitats in a representative area where four biogeographic provinces converge, habitats were compared by recording physicochemical water parameters and climate conditions. The results revealed that species richness did not vary significantly between habitat types (lentic vs. lotic), but showed marked differences at the biogeographical scale, with the arid and semi-arid zones being the most diverse and high elevations having the lowest species richness. Beta diversity analysis indicated higher turnover than nestedness, suggesting that each region hosts a unique fauna adapted to specific conditions. Environmental variables, such as air and water temperatures and humidity played a crucial role, differentially affecting suborders: Anisoptera showed a greater capacity for dispersal and were more affected by landscape-level, while Zygoptera exhibited higher sensitivity to local factors. We concluded that environmental heterogeneity and biogeographical factors are determinants of odonate biodiversity in the region, with Anisoptera following a classical hierarchical community assembly mechanism and Zygoptera is being influenced and limited by the filter created by environmental factors. It is imperative to implement conservation strategies that protect connectivity and integrity of waterbodies to preserve this unique biological heritage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.