Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359384›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Roles and impact of pharmacy technicians on hospital wards: a systematic review.

Marjan De Graef, Jolien Heirman, Tamara Snoeck, Eibert R Heerdink, Nienke E Dijkstra, Tinne Dilles, Brecht Serraes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marjan De GraefClinical Nursing & Allied Health Research and Development Group (CNuAH-RD), Nursing and Paramedical Department, Vitaz Hospital and Health Care, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Jolien HeirmanClinical Nursing & Allied Health Research and Development Group (CNuAH-RD), Nursing and Paramedical Department, Vitaz Hospital and Health Care, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Tamara SnoeckClinical Nursing & Allied Health Research and Development Group (CNuAH-RD), Nursing and Paramedical Department, Vitaz Hospital and Health Care, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Eibert R HeerdinkNurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Nienke E DijkstraNurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Tinne DillesNurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Brecht SerraesClinical Nursing & Allied Health Research and Development Group (CNuAH-RD), Nursing and Paramedical Department, Vitaz Hospital and Health Care, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication management on hospital wards is increasingly supported by pharmacy technicians, yet their specific tasks and effects have not been comprehensively synthesised in the literature. Objective: To synthesise international evidence on the tasks performed by pharmacy technicians on hospital wards and to evaluate the effects on patient-, pharmaceutical-, nursing-, and ward-related outcomes. Information sources: Five databases (EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect) were systematically searched to November 2024, supplemented with hand searches. Methods: This systematic review included studies that reported quantitative outcomes of pharmacy technicians performing medication-related tasks on general wards. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (CASP) were performed independently, and findings were synthesised narratively due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Pharmacy technicians most frequently performed medication history review and reconciliation (11 studies), followed by support in preparation and administration (5 studies), supply and dispensing management (4 studies), and discharge education (3 studies). Across these domains, their involvement was consistently associated with improved patient safety and workflow outcomes. Thirteen studies reported reductions in medication errors, with technicians identifying and correcting omissions, dosing errors, and prescribing discrepancies. Eight studies demonstrated gains in pharmacy staff efficiency through more accurate medication histories and optimised pharmacist time, while six studies highlighted improvements in nursing efficiency, including shorter medication rounds and fewer interruptions. Staff satisfaction increased in five studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses (3 studies) indicated neutral or positive financial impact through reduced missed doses and lower wastage. Patient satisfaction, reported in one study, improved through discharge education, with patients expressing greater understanding of their medications. Conclusions: This systematic review identified a broad range of tasks performed by pharmacy technicians on hospital wards. Although several studies reported positive effects on patient-, pharmaceutical-, nursing-, and ward-related outcomes, the overall methodological quality was moderate and substantial heterogeneity existed in pharmacy technician roles, tasks and outcomes measured. Overall, the evidence suggests consistent beneficial effects across multiple outcome domains, although the strength of inference is limited by methodological heterogeneity and study design limitations. Further high-quality, standardised research is needed to determine the magnitude and generalisability of these effects.

Indexed as

Healthcare workforceInterprofessional collaborationMedication safetyNursing workloadPharmacy techniciansQuality of careWard-based care

Identifiers

PMID42359384
PMCPMC13292472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.