ArticleDental research journal2026
The effect of using silver diamine fluoride at two different times on the microshear bond strength of adhesives to sound and caries-affected dentin.
Article in Dental research journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this laboratory study was to investigate the immediate and delayed effects of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of two types of sixth-generation self-etch and universal etch-and-rinse (ER) adhesives to sound dentin (SD) and Caries-Affected Dentin (CD). Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 120 human third molars were selected, half of which had occlusal caries. First, the occlusal enamel was removed, and SD and CD surrounded by SD were exposed. The samples were divided into three groups. In the first group, SDF was not used; in the second group, SDF was applied, and in the third group, after applying SDF, the samples were incubated in artificial saliva for 1 month. The sixth-generation self-etch adhesive was used in half of the samples, and the universal ER adhesive was used in the other half. The μSBS of the samples was measured, and the strength and type of failure were investigated. The data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Results: The highest mean shear bond strength was observed in the SD without SDF and Clearfil Liner Bond (LB), and the lowest mean shear bond strength was observed in the CD, LB, and Aged SDF. The bond strength was lower in the CD than in the SD ( Conclusion: Applying SDF to SD, regardless of the type of bond, decreases the bond strength, while it increases the bond strength of CD. If SDF is used in SD, it is better to use AB and ER bonding systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.