ReviewInternational journal of pediatrics2026
Incidence of Recurrent Otitis Media With Effusion (OME) Following Tympanostomy in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Meta-Analysis.
Review in International journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence of Recurrent Otitis Media With Effusion (OME) Following Tympanostomy in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Meta-Analysis.International journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common pediatric condition, often managed with tympanostomy tube insertion. However, recurrence after tube extrusion remains a significant concern, with global incidence rates varying across studies. Objective: This systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis is aimed at quantifying the global incidence of recurrent OME post-tympanostomy. Methods: A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Wiley, Ovid, and Scopus) was performed in August 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical assessment tool. Pooled incidence and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. Cumulative meta-analyses were conducted to track global incidence trends over time. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata Version 16 software. Results: From 1117 retrieved articles, 21 met the inclusion criteria. The global pooled incidence of recurrent OME post-tympanostomy was 30% (95% CI: 23%-37%). Subgroup analysis showed 31% recurrence with tubes alone (95% CI: 24%-38%) versus 20% with adjunctive antibiotics (95% CI: 14%-26%). The highest recurrence (45%, 95% CI: 34%-55%) occurred in cases combining tympanostomy with cleft palate surgery. Cumulative meta-analysis indicated a declining trend in OME recurrence between 2005 and 2019, with the incidence rate decreasing from 39% to 24% over this period. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of children undergoing ventilation tube (VT) insertion surgery experience recurrence of OME. Although some studies suggest that adding antibiotics to VT insertion therapy may reduce recurrence in children at risk for chronic infection, this evidence is not consistent and should be interpreted with caution. In addition, patients with cleft palate have a higher likelihood of OME recurrence and require long-term follow-up. These findings may assist physicians in refining treatment decisions based on individual patient characteristics and recurrence risk, though further high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.