ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Without getting under your skin: non-invasive stimulation activates the vagus nerve.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vagus nerve-driven microbiota homeostasis: a promising integrative add-on therapy for neurodevelopmental disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Balancing the autonomic scale: the promise of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in combating cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) has emerged as a practical neuromodulation approach with FDA-cleared indications in primary headache disorders, yet skepticism persists over whether transcutaneous stimulation can reliably engage vagal fibers or whether observed benefits reflect nonspecific cervical activation. Here, we synthesize converging anatomical, biophysical, physiological, and clinical evidence demonstrating that nVNS does, in fact, activate vagal pathways without surgical implantation. We first review cervical vagus anatomy and the biophysical basis for target engagement, including ultrasound-measured nerve depth and multi-scale computational models showing that clinically relevant stimulation can recruit predominantly large myelinated vagal fibers. We then integrate mechanistic evidence across complementary modalities: functional imaging consistently modulates canonical vagal projection sites (including brainstem nuclei), electrophysiology demonstrates peripheral vagal recruitment and centrally transmitted evoked responses, immune studies reveal reproducible suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines consistent with cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex engagement, and autonomic biomarkers show shifts toward increased parasympathetic tone. Finally, we contextualize these mechanistic findings with sham-controlled randomized trials in cluster headache and migraine, where nVNS repeatedly outperforms sham for acute and preventive outcomes with a favorable safety profile. Together, these independent lines of evidence form a coherent mechanistic fingerprint that is difficult to reconcile with placebo or superficial muscle stimulation accounts. We conclude that nVNS provides a credible, scalable means of accessing vagal neurophysiology and represents a clinically validated, paradigm-shifting advance in bioelectronic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.