Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359315›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Psychological mechanisms of AI integration in ESL teaching: teacher self-efficacy and classroom practice in Ghanaian senior high schools.

Heikki Opoku Ofori, Emre Debreli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heikki Opoku OforiFaculty of Education, Cyprus International University, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Türkiye.
Emre DebreliFaculty of Education, Cyprus International University, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into language education has gained increasing attention, yet research has predominantly focused on student outcomes, with limited attention to teachers' roles in mediating these technologies. This study investigates the psychological mechanisms underlying ESL teachers' integration of AI tools in reading and writing instruction in Ghanaian senior high schools. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model and teacher self-efficacy theory, the study adopts a qualitative research design drawing on semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and stimulated recall interviews. The findings indicate that while teachers generally perceive AI tools as useful and moderately easy to use, these perceptions do not directly translate into pedagogical practice. Instead, teacher self-efficacy emerges as a central psychological mechanism shaping the extent and depth of AI integration in classroom contexts. Teachers with higher confidence demonstrate more structured and pedagogically meaningful use, whereas others rely on limited, surface-level applications. The findings also reveal a persistent gap between positive attitudes and enacted practice, shaped by contextual constraints such as limited infrastructure and time, as well as teachers' capacity to adapt AI tools within instructional processes. The study contributes to AI in education research by emphasizing the role of teacher psychology as a mediating layer between technological potential and instructional adaptation, offering a more nuanced understanding of how AI-supported practices are enacted in resource-constrained educational contexts.

Indexed as

AI in educationESL teachingpsychology of language teachingself-efficacyTechnology Acceptance Model

Identifiers

PMID42359315
PMCPMC13292424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.