Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359287›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Social media problematic use, memory concerns, and confidence in young female students from an underrepresented student population.

Maryam BoJulaia, Maura Pilotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryam BoJulaiaDepartment of Sciences and Human Studies, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Maura PilottiDepartment of Sciences and Human Studies, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study focused on an underrepresented population of female undergraduate students from Saudi Arabia, a society that has only recently given women and men equal rights in education and employment. The country's economic sustainable development plan has made young women's educational attainment a critical constituent of its envisioned success. Yet, social media use among the youth has increased exponentially, leading to concerns. The study examined, through a mixed-methods approach, subject variables that might be differentially linked to academic attainment: social media use (as measured by the Bergen Social Media Addiction scale), self-efficacy (as measured by the General Self-Efficacy questionnaire), prospective and retrospective memory concerns (as measured by the Prospective and Retrospective Memory questionnaire). In regression analyses, problematic use of social media was associated with poor grade point average (GPA). More modestly, GPA decreased with retrospective memory concerns and increased with self-efficacy. Female undergraduate students held ostensibly contradictory beliefs on the relationship between social media usage and academic attainment. They viewed social media tools as useful rather than harmful to academic attainment or memory functioning, and even capable of broadening their self-efficacy. Conversely, they labeled the distractions that social media introduced in their lives as difficult to control. These findings suggest that workshops illustrating evidence of cognitive functioning under conditions of distraction may prevent students from minimizing the costs of problematic social media use.

Indexed as

media problematic usememory concernsMiddle Eastself-efficacyundergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID42359287
PMCPMC13290668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.