Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359273›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2026

Same species, different risks: predation shapes hormonal profiles in a breeding sea duck, the common eider.

Bertille Mohring, Farshad S Vakili, Frédéric Angelier, Kim Jaatinen, Suvi Ruuskanen, Olivier Chastel, Charline Parenteau, Bin-Yan Hsu, Titiksha Peetumber, Céline Arzel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bertille MohringSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-4041
Farshad S VakiliDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-6966
Frédéric AngelierCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 405 Rte de Prissé la Charrière, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Kim JaatinenNature Solutions, Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-5647
Suvi RuuskanenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Survontie 9, 40500 Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-9455
Olivier ChastelCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 405 Rte de Prissé la Charrière, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-6770
Charline ParenteauCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 405 Rte de Prissé la Charrière, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5501-5581
Bin-Yan HsuDepartment of Life Science, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung City 407224, Taiwan R.O.C.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-0509
Titiksha PeetumberDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7128-044X
Céline ArzelDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-2067
Markus ÖstEnvironmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500 Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-1437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prey are predicted to respond to humans as they would to predators. Hence, human disturbance can elicit costly physiological and behavioural antipredator responses. However, human presence can also shelter prey from human-averse predators (the human 'scarecrow effect'). Whether this 'scarecrow effect' reduces perceived predation risk and promotes prey reproductive investment, as predicted by life-history theory, remains unclear. To test this, we monitored complementary hormonal markers in two geographically proximate colonies of common eiders

Indexed as

Corticosteroneenergy expenditurehuman disturbanceparental investmentprolactinscarecrow effect, Somateria mollissima; stress responsethyroid hormonestourism

Identifiers

PMID42359273
PMCPMC13293623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.