ArticleAdvances in orthopedics2026
Lateral Plate Versus Isolated Lag Screw Fixation of Unstable Distal Fibula Fractures: A Systematic Review.
Article in Advances in orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lateral Plate Versus Isolated Lag Screw Fixation of Unstable Distal Fibula Fractures: A Systematic Review.Advances in orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lateral plate fixation, the current standard for fixation of unstable distal fibular fractures, can compromise the minimal soft tissue envelope resulting in poorer postoperative outcomes. Isolated lag screw fixation represents a novel method of distal fibula fixation. Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and MEDLINE (Ovid) in February 2024. Randomised control trials (RCTs), non-randomised control trials and cohort studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. PRISMA guidelines were followed. This systematic review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024521746). Results were synthesised by structured qualitative analysis. Results: Four studies (207 patients) were included. Compared to lateral plate fixation, lag screw-only fixation for distal fibula fractures resulted in reduced operative times, incision lengths, costs, hardware-related issues, ankle symptomatology, and complications, with comparable or improved functional outcomes and similar radiographic healing under equivalent postoperative care. These findings were applicable to patients under 60 years old with noncomminuted, oblique, or spiral unstable distal fibula fractures. Conclusion: Isolated lag screw fixation represents a novel method of distal fibular fracture fixation in select patients. Reducing hardware burden on the soft tissue envelope improved operative and patient outcomes without compromising standard postoperative care. The methodological and clinical differences among the included studies limited this review. Additionally, only four eligible studies were included, all with significant bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.