Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359243›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Contemporary Approaches to Pain Assessment and Management: A Clinical Perspective.

Maheshvari N Patel, Nayan Patel

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maheshvari N PatelClinical Research, NovoBliss Research Private Limited, Ahmedabad, IND.
Nayan PatelClinical Research Operations, NovoBliss Research Private Limited, Ahmedabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is a complex phenomenon whose assessment involves not only physiological but also psychological and social components. Due to its subjective and variable nature, accurately measuring chronic pain remains challenging in both clinical practice and research settings. Various assessment approaches have been developed to evaluate pain and its impact on patients; however, many commonly used methods, particularly unidimensional tools, primarily focus on pain intensity and often fail to capture its broader effects on affective, cognitive, and functional domains. Recent advances in pain science have led to the development of more objective and mechanistically informative evaluation techniques. Approaches that assess sensory function provide insights into peripheral and central pain processing, while advanced imaging technologies have improved understanding of brain mechanisms and neural adaptations associated with chronic pain. In addition, emerging sensor-based devices and digital health tools enable continuous, real-time monitoring of physiological and functional parameters related to pain. These developments align with evolving conceptual frameworks that recognize chronic pain as a distinct clinical condition rather than merely a symptom. The integration of conventional assessment approaches with advanced multidimensional techniques holds significant potential to enhance the accuracy and clinical relevance of pain evaluation. This scientific communication aims to highlight current methodologies, identify existing challenges, and explore future directions, emphasizing the importance of a holistic and standardized approach to pain assessment.

Indexed as

chronic painneuroimagingpain measurementpatient-reported outcome measuresquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID42359243
PMCPMC13292906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.