ArticleCureus2026
Role of Serum Growth Factor and Inflammatory Markers in Predicting the Progression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common malignancy with variable clinical outcomes and a high risk of recurrence. Conventional prognostic indicators often fail to fully capture tumor behavior. Serum growth factors and inflammatory mediators, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), may provide additional insights into disease progression and prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serial serum levels of EGFR, IL-6, and TNF-α in patients with OSCC. Methodology This prospective cohort study included 120 patients with histopathologically confirmed OSCC. Serum samples were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months and analyzed for EGFR, IL-6, and TNF-α using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical and pathological data were also recorded. Statistical analyses were performed. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent t-tests, correlations were assessed using Spearman's coefficient, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence-free survival. Results In total, 34 (28.33%) patients with recurrence showed significantly higher baseline levels of EGFR (82.3 ± 24.1 vs. 62.9 ± 19.4 ng/mL), IL-6 (26.4 ± 10.8 vs. 15.9 ± 7.1 pg/mL), and TNF-α (42.7 ± 16.3 vs. 28.6 ± 12.1 pg/mL) compared to non-recurrent cases (p < 0.001). Similar trends persisted at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001). Significant positive correlations were identified between baseline biomarker levels and clinicopathological parameters. Tumor size showed moderate correlations with EGFR (r = 0.54), IL-6 (r = 0.48), and TNF-α (r = 0.42). Similarly, tumor-node-metastasis stage demonstrated strong correlations with EGFR (r = 0.61), IL-6 (r = 0.57), and TNF-α (r = 0.51). Lymph node metastasis also showed significant positive correlations with EGFR (r = 0.52), IL-6 (r = 0.49), and TNF-α (r = 0.45) (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the baseline EGFR (p < 0.001), IL-6 (p = 0.002), and TNF-α (p = 0.028) as independent predictors of recurrence of OSCC. Conclusions Serum EGFR, IL-6, and TNF-α may serve as potential prognostic indicators for OSCC. The findings of this study suggest that combining growth factors and inflammatory biomarkers could have clinical utility for improving prognostic assessment in OSCC. Serial monitoring may provide a dynamic approach for identifying patients at higher risk of recurrence, thereby facilitating timely therapeutic interventions and closer surveillance. Incorporation of these markers into routine clinical protocols might contribute to more personalized treatment strategies and potentially improve long-term outcomes. However, further large-scale studies are required to validate these findings and establish standardized clinical thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.