ArticleCureus2026
Erdheim-Chester Disease Presenting as a Suprasellar Mass.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, sporadic, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis with multiorgan involvement. Less than half of patients present with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, usually affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA), meninges, and brain parenchyma. CNS-only involvement is extremely rare and can lead to challenges in both diagnosis and management. Clinical course of the disease is varied, ranging from indolent to disabling and life-threatening forms. We report a case of a 55-year-old woman who presented with panhypopituitarism and central diabetes insipidus (DI) in 2016 and was found to have a rapidly enlarging suprasellar mass with non-specific radiologic features. Transcortical biopsy at the time of presentation was inconclusive, and high-dose corticosteroid therapy with close clinical follow-up was initiated. Over a period of six months, the patient had progressive disease with involvement of the hypothalamus and profound tracking cytotoxic edema. Surgical management in the form of endonasal, extended transsphenoidal resection was performed. Final pathology demonstrated a histiocytic neoplasm positive for BRAF V600E mutation (VE1) by immunohistochemistry, consistent with ECD. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges associated with ECD involving the CNS, particularly in anatomically complex regions where tissue sampling may be limited and histologic findings non-specific. While BRAF-targeted therapies were not routinely available at the time of the patient's presentation, identification of BRAF mutations has significant therapeutic implications, enabling the use of targeted therapies in patients with unresectable or progressive disease. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with central DI with indeterminate suprasellar lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.