ArticleCureus2026
Evaluation of a Haptic Virtual Reality Simulator and Its Impact on Preclinical Dental Education.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaptic simulation is increasingly being integrated into health education due to its ability to provide a realistic tactile experience, enhancing skill acquisition, student confidence in clinical settings, and reducing iatrogenic risks. In dentistry, this tool complements traditional teaching methodologies by facilitating hands-on preclinical training. This study aimed to evaluate students' perceptions regarding the use of haptic simulation in their learning process and preclinical skill development.
methodsA scientifically validated 10-question survey was administered to students at the Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí who had undergone training with dental phantoms, followed by practice with the Simodont® haptic simulator (Nissin Dental Products BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The survey was conducted via an online platform (Google Forms, Google LLC, CA, USA), yielding responses from 125 students from the fifth semester onwards.
resultsThe results indicate that 75% (n = 94) of the students perceive a significant improvement in their manual skills and abilities, 79.5% (n = 99) consider haptic simulation an effective tool for self-directed learning, and 79.6% (n = 100) report increased confidence in performing cavity preparations on real patients after training with Simodont®.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that haptic simulation serves as a valuable adjunct to conventional preclinical training in dental education, reinforcing both technical proficiency and student confidence before clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.