ArticleBlood global hematology2025
Neurocognitive functioning of patients with sickle cell disease in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Blood global hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic blood disorder that affects the production of hemoglobin. Patients with SCD display slowed neurocognitive development resulting from a combination of cerebrovascular complications and sociodemographic factors. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), patients have limited access to neurocognitive surveillance. We sought to evaluate the neurocognitive impact of SCD in patients living in LMICs, establish which neurocognitive assessment measures are commonly used in this setting, and determine how these measures are contextually adapted. To answer these questions, we used an exhaustive literature search to systematically collect abstracts. Studies that focused on participants with SCD of any genotype and included a measure of cognitive/academic outcomes were included, whereas commentaries and editorials were excluded. A total of 1831 abstracts were screened, with 39 abstracts selected for full-text review and 21 articles used for data extraction. Most studies were conducted in Africa, Middle Eastern countries, and Brazil. Common measures included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children or Adults. In 8 studies that included a measure of overall intelligence for patients with SCD and a control group, patients with SCD showed lower performance (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.