ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Evolution of China's industry-university-research-hospital collaboration in AI medical devices and implications for medical institutions and public health governance.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Double-Edged Nature of Patient-to-Patient Interactions in Digital Healthcare Communities: A Qualitative Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Video Monitoring for Inpatient Fall Prevention: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical risk-aware reinforcement learning for latency-constrained healthcare IoT scheduling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Toward Explainable Precision Nephrology: Machine Learning-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Hospital burden, amputation risk, and mortality trends in diabetic foot patients: a retrospective public health analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of China's rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), and intelligent healthcare policies, the integration of AI into medical devices is reshaping healthcare delivery and innovation systems. Based on patent data on industry-university-research cooperation in the China AI medical device industry from 2019 to 2025, this study adopts social network analysis and geographical detector methods to systematically examine the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of the innovation network across three dimensions. The findings reveal that at the microagent level, the early dominant pattern of enterprises has been gradually reconstructed by the participation of universities, research institutes, and medical institutions, with medical institutions rising from marginal participants to core intermediaries. At the provincial level, the network exhibits prominent unbalanced agglomeration characteristics. Beijing's status as a national hub has been continuously strengthened, and a multipolar spatial pattern has taken initial shape. At the level of the cooperation type, intraprovincial cooperation is dominated by industry-industry collaboration, while interprovincial cooperation has formed a cross-regional synergy framework with Beijing as the core, radiating to the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. The value added of the financial industry, the volume of import and export trade, and the transaction volume of the technology market are revealed as the core factors explaining the network status of provinces, whereas the explanatory power of the proportion of education expenditure remains weak. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of China's AI medical device industry and offers practical insights regarding public health governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.