Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359093›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.

Yingbo Ren, Lei Huang, Ling Chen, Feng Liu, Lihong Song, Qingyuan Li, Xin Wang, Hongyan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingbo Ren *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Lei Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Ling Chen *Neurology Department, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of General Surgery (Vascular Surgery), The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Lihong SongClinical Medical College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Qingyuan LiChengdu School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Hongyan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perioperative hypothermia remains a common complication among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia and is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Early identification of patients estimated to be at high risk may facilitate targeted preventive strategies. However, practical and individualized prediction tools for perioperative hypothermia in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery remain limited. Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included adult patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia between January 2019 and February 2024. The prediction model was developed and internally validated using a split-sample design within this gynecologic laparoscopic surgery cohort. Perioperative hypothermia was defined as a core body temperature <36.0 °C during the intraoperative or immediate postoperative period. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort for model development ( Results: A total of 424 patients were included, of whom 279 (65.8%) developed perioperative hypothermia, a relatively high incidence that may reflect the outcome definition, routine temperature surveillance, and the characteristics of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Feature selection consistently retained age, body mass index, and operative time as the final model predictors. These variables were incorporated into the final prediction model and nomogram. In the training cohort, the model demonstrated good discrimination with an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI, 0.732-0.843), good calibration, and favorable clinical utility. In the split-sample internal validation cohort, discrimination remained stable with an AUC of 0.810 (95% CI, 0.727-0.893), and calibration and decision curve analyses showed consistent model performance. Bootstrap internal validation yielded an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.776 and an optimism-corrected calibration slope of 0.91. At the training-derived Youden cutoff, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.623 and specificity of 0.853 in the training cohort, and a sensitivity of 0.925 and specificity of 0.580 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: A simple nomogram based on age, body mass index, and operative time was developed and internally validated to estimate the predicted probability of perioperative hypothermia specifically in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia. Within this surgical setting, the tool may assist clinicians in perioperative risk stratification, triage for intensified temperature monitoring or active warming, and individualized temperature-management planning. External validation in independent laparoscopic gynecologic cohorts is required before broader clinical implementation.

Indexed as

general anesthesialaparoscopic gynecologic surgerynomogramperioperative hypothermiarisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42359093
PMCPMC13290850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.